I love to argue. One of the great things about justice is that it is not something that can be applied as one-size-fits-all. We have laws and precedent that help guide our hands, but cases are always unique enough that you need people to interpret all of the different variables to come up with a result. If it was easy, trials could be won or lost by submitting evidence into a computer and letting it spit out a result, but our legal system allows for a certain human element that works with the regulations that we put into place. It is for this reason that many have trouble coming up with a definition of law. But it is in the pursuit of a definition that we find our rules for coexistence and you can get a better understanding with private law tutors.
Laws date back as far as civilization. One of the first deciphered writings of the law came in the form of Hammurabi’s Code, which was a set of laws enacted by the sixth Babylonian king, Hammurabi. Some of the laws came with punishments, like an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth, while others dealt with matters of contract, like establishing a standard wage to be paid for an ox driver or doctor. Others were about transactions and liability, like what happens if you damage someone else’s property while it is in your care or punishment for doctors who kill a rich patient (hands cut off) vs. a slave (financial restitution). Others were about relationships, such as divorce and reproductive behavior.
These days, we have come up with laws that are far more straightforward and far fairer across class than before. There are still problems with how we apply that law, especially when it comes to people of color, but we are not taking an eye for an eye anymore. In a lot of ways, our laws now make things more complicated than ever because we have had time to shape our laws for so long and doing so has created legal traps. For example, the podcast Serial took a look inside the way that Ohio courts apply our laws and found some stunning cases of abuse of power. In one interesting episode, they looked at the cycle of incarceration created by suspending licenses. There are a number of crimes that can result in a suspended license and those come with fines. You might get your license suspended for failing to pay child support (which you could not afford to pay), which amounts to a fine for not paying money. How do you pay more when you could not pay in the first place? This leads to more suspensions, more issues, and, in the end, puts someone in a position where they can’t show any sort of improvement. It is designed to breed recidivism over rehabilitation.
Many legal scholars deal with issues like this on a daily basis. In trying to solve one problem, we inevitably create six more. The death penalty is an okay idea in theory, but is it a great idea in practice? If there is one case where someone is innocent but gets put to death, is the death penalty worth it? In this case, we seem to have decided yes, as there have been many death penalty victims proven innocent. It is such a legal issue that some have put forth other solutions, like cryogenically freezing death row inmates and unfreezing them if they are innocent.
The interesting thing about law is that there are no right answers. Ultimately, we figure out what we are most comfortable with as people and work from there. If you want to explore the rules of society, search for law tutors near me today.